Federal Court Limits NLRB’s Ability to Compel Union Bargaining - HR ALERTS
- Regina Dyerly, SHRBP, PHR

- Mar 31
- 1 min read
Federal Court Limits NLRB’s Ability to Compel Union Bargaining

Effective: March 11, 2026
On March 11, 2026, A federal appeals court has limited the National Labor Relations Board’s ability to require employers to recognize and bargain with a union without a formal election win.
In a recent decision, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the NLRB’s use of the Cemex framework, which allowed the Board to order employers to bargain with unions if certain violations occurred during organizing campaigns.
What Happened
Employees at a Kentucky distillery voted against unionization
The NLRB found the employer engaged in unfair labor practices
Instead of ordering a new election, the NLRB required the employer to recognize and bargain with the union under the Cemex standard
Court’s Ruling
The court agreed the employer violated labor law
However, it ruled the NLRB overstepped its authority by applying the Cemex standard
The case was sent back to apply the traditional standard or conduct a new election
Why It Matters
This is the first federal appeals court to reject the Cemex approach, signaling potential limits on how aggressively the NLRB can impose bargaining obligations.
While the ruling only applies in certain states, other courts may follow.
What Employers Should Do
Continue to exercise caution during union organizing activity
Avoid implementing wage increases, benefit changes, or incentives during organizing campaigns without guidance
Understand that even well-intended actions can be viewed as influencing employee choice
Get day-to-day updates on Federal Court Limits NLRB’s Ability to Compel Union Bargaining visit the Vida HR Knowledge Center (Vida HR Clients Exclusive).




Comments